The Internet, Congress and possibly your Mom are all freaking out this week about a Wall St. Journal article challenging Facebook’s passing of some limited User ID numbers to 3rd party companies, including advertisers. Many people consider it a privacy violation.
I challenged Facebook as vehemently as anyone on the Internet a year ago when the company switched its user privacy setting from default private to default public, but this latest critique really misses the mark. Distribution of publicly available user data in bulk is wildly valuable – and not just for advertisers. Here are three examples of great things built by user data passed around the web.
The following examples have nothing to do with advertising. They are examples of beneficial uses of bulk-extracted, publicly available social network user data. It’s because of technologies like these, and many more that could be created to enrich our lives, that Facebook ought to make more information about users available – not less.
That should be done with our consent as users, but discussion of the upsides is an important part of the discussion. So is development of technology that’s worth sharing your data with. If all people know about is advertising use of this data, that may not be worth it to them to expose even the simplest information about themselves. But there’s potential for a whole lot more.
Context
Rapportive is a Gmail plug-in that uses data from Rapleaf, one of the companies at the center of the Facebook privacy flare-up. Rapportive maps the email adresses of people you’re corresponding with to their publicly available social network data captured by Rapleaf. Rapportive users can see the pictures, names, careers and recent online activity of people they email with. It’s incredibly useful. A privacy violation? Hardly.
Discovery
Twiangulate is a service that analyzes public friend connections on Twitter and identifies who selected users have in common as people they follow. Below, George Stephanopoulos, Anna Marie Cox and Wolf Blitzer all follow a little-known man named Tony Fratto. That’s valuable information. Is it a privacy violation? You might think so…if you were dropped into Twitter from a time machine. This is just savvy, and savvy people good and bad are going to use this kind of knowledge.
Global Self-Awareness
Cross reference public user data with any other type of data and you can learn something, especially when location is included. Does musical taste correlate with type of restaurants available? Education level and density of neighborhood grocery stores? Mentions online of the word “Limbaugh” (mapped below) and the proximity of toxic waste spills of neurotoxins? The public wants to know.
Above: OpenHeatMap maps Twitter search results. Machines are tracking what you say – but is that a threat? This looks like a social good to me. OpenHeatMap was built by social network data hacker Pete Warden, who has published some very interesting observations based on bulk analysis of Facebook data.
“I love the term ‘data exhaust’,” Warden says. “People are spewing out so much information that is completely non-sensitive and individually boring, but when you get enough of it patterns emerge.”
0 Responses
Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.